A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that could allow several new casino resorts become built through the entire state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question which he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum includes a number of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the question mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. Based on case filed into the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the usage of general public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use public money to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has had up problems with the language into the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised advantages of casino expansion.
Interestingly, the original language in the referendum did not mention any of the benefits being set to appear in the ballot question that is final. Whenever the first draft arrived from their state attorney general’s office, the language was more direct and didn’t are the legislative purposes. Those showed up only after the Board of Elections changed the wording, after what co-chairman Douglas Kellner said had been ‘extensive talks.’
Wording Can Affect Outcome, Historically Speaking
The language of the ballot concern might seem such as for instance a thing that is trivial battle over, but history has shown some time once again that even minor modifications to your name or wording of legislation can have a significant effect on public opinion, and who has proven real once more in this case.
According to a poll by Siena university, 55% of New York voters were in favor associated with the referendum when they certainly were read issue since it is scheduled to show up on the November 5 ballot, with 42% opposed. But when voters were instead asked a similar question with more neutral language, these people were evenly divided on the problem.
That ‘advocating language’ is exactly what Snyder whom additionally opposes casino expansion myself says should cause the court to enjoin voting on the bill until more language that is neutral invest its spot.
‘It is partisan, and it is having an effect,’ Snyder said. ‘And that isn’t the federal government’s part.’
The success of the referendum is in some doubt regardless of the language used despite the promising poll numbers. With no elections that are statewide for November, turnout is likely to be low in many towns. However in nyc, a contested mayor’s race will likely lead to higher turnout there and voters within the city are far more skeptical about the casino expansion than voters in the rest of the state.
For Tribal Gaming Lobby, It’s a row that is tough Hoe in Congress
Scenes similar to this one, of tribal gaming lobbyists working their issues in Congress, are not producing results that are many days
An lot that is awful of are unhappy with the direction or lack thereof of the United States Congress this season. You can now add Native American tribes that operate casinos across the nation to that list that is long.
No Respect in Congress for Tribal Issues
Discussing the lack of any legislation that is federal clarify and regulate the new general Wild West that is state-by-state online gambling in the U.S. these days, John Gusik a founding partner for the Washington D.C.-based law and government relations services outfit called the Franklin Partnership, had this to express at the recent Global Gaming Expo (G2E) in Las Vegas: ‘There were 4,500 bills in Congress this year; only 31 have been enacted. It’s really a do-nothing Congress. Seventy-two bills dealing with tribal issues and none have already been enacted. Internet gaming continues to languish in Congress.’
As the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 established the framework for Native casinos that are american benefit this until-then underclass economically, it has not all been champagne and flowers for many of this tribes, whom still grapple with basic dilemmas such as better education and health care due to their members. And now as legal online poker in Nevada and imminently, legal online casino gambling in New Jersey and Maryland take hold the Indian ‘special nation’ status vis a vis gambling enterprises may be threatened, specially as gambling industry executives warn of impending market saturation throughout all the U.S. that will affect the marketplace that is entire.
Clearly, all the drama health that is surrounding plus the government shutdown hasn’t exactly helped put focus on Indian casino industry issues either.
Casino Money Isn’t Enough, Lobbyists Insist
The nationwide Indian Gaming Commission showed $27.9 billion in gaming revenues in 2012, which is up 2.6 percent from $27.2 billion in 2011, therefore the tribes may have trouble garnering sympathy that is much anyone in a still unsteady economy, but lobbyists says there is much more at stake for the tribes than just revenue.
‘they think you must work on Indian gaming all the time,’ said Pete Kirkham, who runs Red Maple Consulting, a government affairs and political strategy firm, and works with many of the tribes on various legislative issues if you represent tribes. ‘ Gaming takes up some right time but it is also about wellness care, education and housing.’
Kirkham says they are nevertheless waiting on 13 appropriation bills that the tribes significance of funding. He says that while the majority of tribal income is gaming-derived, that much of it goes directly back into the community.
‘Everything is now seen through the prism of video gaming,’ stated Jana McKeag, president of Lowry techniques, an Alexandria, Va., government and public affairs consulting firm. ‘Congress believes that tribes have all this gaming money … why do they need (federal dollars)?’
Other dilemmas that tribal lobbyists want addressed involve the profusion of off-reservation casinos in areas where those casinos might take business away from the Indian people. Additionally, the expansion of Web cafes in states like California, Florida, and vermont are noticed as a problem the whole video gaming industry must address.
‘In California, as an example, they’re unlawful but the state doesn’t have cash to shut them down,’ McKeag noted in the panel that is g2E. ‘They are not regulated and are an opportunity for cash laundering. The thing is them straight down, they just pop up elsewhere. if they shut’
Meanwhile, with every thing taking place in Congress today, it doesn’t look like tribal gaming dilemmas are going to proceed to the leading of the line any time soon.
Gambling enterprises Ready to Add Nostalgia-Based Skill Games to Their Rosters
Slot manufacturer IGT has reintroduced the old Centipede game for slots to tap in to the nostalgia craze
They offer, casinos are usually careful to limit just how much players can affect the games through their own skill when it comes to the games. Sure, blackjack and video poker offer players the opportunity to make skillful choices, but even perfect play still makes the casino with a small advantage (and they can always just stop letting you play) if you overcome that through card counting,. Many other games, like slots, are completely based on random luck.
Everything Old is New Again
However with casinos in search of new avenues with which to attract customers, it seems like skill-based gaming might be coming to a venue near you. That’s your message from the gaming that is global (G2E), where manufacturers had been showing off games that allow players to utilize their skills in an effort to provide them a better opportunity to win cash.
The biggest hit that was seen at G2E in this genre is a device developed by Global Game Technology. IGT has made a machine on the basis of the 1981 hit game that is arcade, in which players shoot virtual insects in order to score points.
Centipede had been originally developed by Atari, company that has very long since passed its heyday. But IGT and other manufacturers are hoping to cash in on a revolution of nostalgia that may lure middle-aged gamblers whom have fond memories of playing early games that are arcade.
The points that players score could be directly translated into money in the casino version of Centipede. Needless to say, the casino nevertheless wants to have the bonus, so you’ll need to get happy to get into bonus rounds and even probably the most skilled player will be an underdog over time against the casino.
Playing Against Other Players on Devices
But that isn’t where games like Centipede plan on stopping. The equipment additionally enables two players to go head-to-head on the machines, aided by the better player walking away using the winnings. That’s a true battle of ability, similar to just how players can fulfill one another at the poker table, with the casino taking only a cut that is small ensure they profit.
Middle-agers aren’t the only ones that IGT and other manufacturers (WMS and Aristocrat both say they have skill-based games within the works) are hoping that these games can pull in; these firms also want to lure more youthful players to slots, which traditionally have now been the bailiwick of a older demographic. A couple of new games by Bally Technologies even incorporate leader panels in order to try and get players back within the practice of wanting high ratings.
‘The casino would love it if players are like, ‘Oh, I obtained beat! I have to go back and play some more to get into the lead,” said Bally spokesman Mike Trask. ‘if they were 15 years old in 1985 playing against their friends, lucky nugget disney trying to get the score that is highest, that person is practically 50 years old now, plus they’re right in the demographic.’
Others think that one of the keys will be players that are matching head-to-head skill contests with money exactly in danger. It has become a reality in online game titles, plus some see casinos could perform some thing that is same.
‘Let me play Madden football, let me play EA Hockey,’ stated Geoff Freeman, head of the United states Gaming Association. ‘ We’ll put $20 down, the winner gets $15 and the house gets $5.’
However, casino experts point out that these sorts of experiences will probably only add up to a niche market in the industry. In the end, they say, casinos nevertheless make a lot more cash when gamblers play against them than once they simply take on each other.